Las crisis en la literatura de políticas públicas
Elementos teóricos para el análisis de la gobernanza en tiempos turbulentos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31391/4291h136Palabras clave:
Políticas públicas, Gestión de crisis, Gobernanza, Cambio de políticas, Análisis de políticas públicas, Pandemia del covid–19Resumen
Este artículo es una revisión de la bibliografía sobre políticas públicas en contextos de crisis, con énfasis en las respuestas gubernamentales durante la pandemia de covid–19. Examina el concepto de crisis, la evolución hacia perspectivas de gobernanza flexible y discute las coyunturas fluidas en la formulación de políticas. Se argumenta la necesidad de sistemas de gobernanza más adaptativos para enfrentar crisis con mayor efectividad.
Referencias
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/PADM.12874
Barberia, L., Plümper, T., & Whitten, G. D. (2021). The political science of Covid–19: An introduction. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2045–2054. https://doi.org/10.1111/SSQU.13069
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Mortensen, P. B. (2023). Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking . En Theories of the Policy Process (5.a ed., pp. 65–99). Routledge.
Béland, D., Cantillon, B., Hick, R., Greve, B., & Moreira, A. (2023). Policy Legacies, Welfare Regimes, and Social Policy Responses to COVID–19 in Europe. En S. Börner & S.–M. Kaiser (Eds.), European Social Policy and the COVID–19 Pandemic. Challenges to National Welfare and EU Policy (pp. 3–27). Oxford University Press.
Cairney, P. (2012). Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.x
Cairney, P., & Weible, C. M. (2017). The new policy sciences: combining the cognitive science of choice, multiple theories of context, and basic and applied analysis. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9304-2
Calò, F., Scognamiglio, F., Bellazzecca, E., & Ongaro, E. (2024). Social innovation during turbulent times: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Public Management Review, preprint. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2219998
Capano, G., Howlett, M., Jarvis, D. S. L., & Ramesh, M. (2022). Long–term policy impacts of the coronavirus: normalization, adaptation, and acceleration in the post–COVID state. Policy and Society, 41(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/POLSOC/PUAB018
Capano, G., & Toth, F. (2023). Thinking outside the box, improvisation, and fast learning: Designing policy robustness to deal with what cannot be foreseen. Public Administration, 101(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/PADM.12861
Cardozo, N. D., & Curti, G. (2024). Introducción. Políticas públicas comparadas en América Latina: discusiones teóricas y acción gubernamental en tiempos turbulentos. En N. D. Cardozo & G. Curti (Eds.), Políticas públicas comparadas en América Latina: discusiones teóricas y acción gubernamental en tiempos turbulentos (pp. 29-43). UNR Editora/ ALACIP. https://alacip.org/?p=47851
Dobry, M. (1986). Sociologie des crises politiques. Presses de Sciences Po.
Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the Structural Transformation of the State: Interrogating the Process of Change. Political Studies, 1, 3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00018
Haynes, P. (2008). Complexity theory and evaluation in public management. Public Management Review, 10(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002766
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2012). From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x
Koselleck, R. (2007). Crítica y Crisis. Trotta.
Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The Policy Orientation. En D. G. Macrae, D. Lerner, & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method (pp. 3–15). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/587173
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
Lotta Spanghero, G., Morangueira Magri, G., Nunes, A. C., Soares Benedito, B., Aliberti, C., Caracho Ribeiro, E., Lima Silva, F., Thomazinho, G., Pereira, G., Rocha Miranda, J., Garcia Corrêa, M., Costa Silveira, M., Martins Krieger, M. G., Barcellos, T., & Santos, A. (2021). The impact of the Covid–19 pandemic on the performance of street level bureaucrats in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 35, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2021.35.243776
Lund, C. S., & Andersen, L. B. (2023). Professional development leadership in turbulent times: Public administration symposium: Robust politics and governance in turbulent times. Public Administration, 101(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/PADM.12854
Lustig, N., Martínez Pabon, V., Sanz, F., & Younger, S. D. (2021). The Impact of COVID–19 and Expanded Social Assistance on Inequality and Poverty in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico (92; CEQ Working Paper 92). www.commitmentoequity.org/datacenter.
Muller, P. (2000). L’analyse cognitive des politiques publiques : vers une sociologie politique de l’action publique. Revue française de science politique, 50(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.2000.395464
Ricoeur, P. (2006). Tiempo y narración. Siglo XXI Editores.
Rosenthal, U., Charles, M. T., & ’t Hart, P. (1989). Coping with crises: the management of disasters, riots, and terrorism. C. C. Thomas.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins–Smith, H. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition framework. En P. Sabatier & H. Jenkins–Smith (Eds.), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach (pp. 41–56). Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A., & Schlager, E. (2000). Les approches cognitives des politiques publiques: perspectives américaines. Revue Française de Science Politique, 50(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.2000.395465
Subirats i Humet, J. (2021). Complejidad, urgencia y dinámicas de gobierno. La gestión de la pandemia del coronavirus. En E. del Pino Matute & J. Subirats i Humet (Eds.), Las administraciones ante los riesgos sociales y globales. Repensando la Administración (pp. 101–118). Instituto Nacional de la Administración Pública.
Trondal, J. (2023). “Let’s organize”: The organizational basis for stable public governance. Public Administration, 101(1), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/PADM.12858
Wernli, D., Böttcher, L., Vanackere, F., Kaspiarovich, Y., Masood, M., & Levrat, N. (2023). Understanding and governing global systemic crises in the 21st century: A complexity perspective. Global Policy, 14(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13192
Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power. Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Little Brown.
Zahariadis, N., Petridou, E., Exadaktylos, T., & Sparf, J. (2021). Policy styles and political trust in Europe’s national responses to the COVID-–9 crisis. Policy Studies, 44(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.2019211
Zaki, B. L., & Wayenberg, E. (2023). Policy learning and the COVID–19 crisis: A systematic review of scholarship and key lessons for research and practice. Australian Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12598
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Análisis Plural
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
